He will render to each one according to his works: to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life; but for those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury. There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek, but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, the Jew first and also the Greek. For God shows no partiality. (Romans 2:6-11)
For I am not aware of anything against myself, but I am not thereby acquitted. It is the Lord who judges me. Therefore do not pronounce judgment before the time, before the Lord comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in darkness and will disclose the purposes of the heart. Then each one will receive his commendation from God. (1 Corinthians 4:4-5)
These texts and a few others like them (James 2:14-16, 2 Cor. 5:10) seem pretty problematic for the Protestant defender of justification by faith. Many of us who are raised hearing the message of justification in Christ being received as a gift of grace by faith alone–good news that I wholeheartedly affirm–often stumble when we run across these verses that seem to link our justification to our good works in some way.
Various options have been presented, with one of the most popular suggestions being that texts like Romans 2 are only talking about a hypothetical judgment on the basis of works that nobody attains. Sort of setting up works in order to knock it down with faith kind of thing. While this is a broad and complex subject, I wanted to just briefly outline and quote an alternative proposal by G.K. Beale and others that I’ve found quite helpful.
Justification in the Already-Not-Yet and the Costo Card of Works
Pointing in a couple of directions, Beale, Richard Gaffin, and a few others talk about a two-stage or double-justification of the believer. Drawing on the already/not yet dimension of New Testament theology, they say there is a sense and dimension of our justification which is already fully accomplished. And yet, there are texts that point us to the idea that some part of our judgment and justification still awaits and that the Spirit-inspired works that we engage in through union with Christ will play a part of that.
Drawing on Jonathan Edwards, Beale talks about this as the difference ‘Initial’ justification and also of ‘manifestive’ justification. The first is received by union with Christ through faith in the final work of Christ in his life, penal death, and justifying resurrection. Christ’s work is the “basis”, the cause, the foundation for our justification and nothing else. That said, the next stage of ‘manifestive’ justification–demonstrating before the world that a believer truly has been united to Christ–is “in accordance with” our works, or lines up with the fact of our Spirit-wrought obedience.
If you’re confused, Beale has a helpful section and analogy spelling it out. And really, this example is the whole point of my post:
How can believers be said to “judged by works” and yet be justified by faith? There is much more to be said that can be elaborated on here about the believer’s righteous works in connection to this consummate, manifestive stage of justification, and the following is just the beginning of an answer to that question. An illustration must suffice for now to summarize my own view of this connection. In the United States there are large discount food stores that require people to pay an annual fee to have the privilege of buying food there. Once this fee is paid, the member must present a card as evidence of having paid the fee; only then is entrance to the store allowed. The card is necessary to get into the store, but it is not the ultimate reason that the person is granted access. The paid fee is the ultimate reason for the entrance, and the card is the evidence that the fee has been paid. We may refer to the fee paid as the necessary causal condition of entrance into the store and the evidence-testifying card as the necessary condition (but not the necessary causal condition). The card is the external manifestation or proof that the prior price was paid, so that both the money paid and the card are necessary for admittance, but they do not have the same conditional force for allowing entrance…
Likewise, Christ’s justifying penal death (together with his imputed obedient life through identification with his vindicating resurrection) is the price paid “once for all” (Heb. 9:12; cf. 26-28), and the good works done within the context of Christian faith become the inevitable evidence of such faith at the final judicial evaluation. –G.K. Beale, “Resurrection in the Already-And-Not-Yet Phases of Justification”, in For the Glory of God’s Name:Essays in Honor of John Piper, eds. Sam Storms and Justin Taylor, pp. 204-25
In other words, Jesus pays the price connected with our initial and ultimate justification. Our Spirit-wrought works are the Costco card we will inevitably have in our hand as our manifestive justification, proving, or giving evidence that we have indeed accepted Christ’s sacrifice on our behalf and have been united with him. Beale’s whole article is worth reading in the way he spells out the importance of the resurrection of the body and works for the public vindication of believers.
I think a reading like this actually makes quite good sense. It secures the essential, unique, fundamental work of Jesus Christ for us, outside of us that we gain access to only through trusting faith. It also makes sense of the sorts of texts in Romans 2 and in the Corinthian letters that speak of the necessity of works for our final justification, without resorting to writing them off as hypotheticals. By faith we are united to Christ, justified by our gracious God, and filled with the Holy Spirit who enables us to do works which manifest that faith.
For more on this, I suggest Beale’s big book on NT theology, or, shorter and more quickly at hand, Richard Gaffin has a helpful related article on justification by faith with works in Calvin over at Reformation21.
Soli Deo Gloria
I wrote a post on how the reformers Luther and Calvin interpreted Justification in James.
My contention is that they misinterpreted how he understands ‘justified’ when he says ‘a person is justified by works and not by faith alone’.
The relationship between justification and sanctification is one of my favorite things to think about and try to work out in my mind. I’m sometimes tempted to swing between some level of laziness regarding good works (“I’m saved by Christ so good works are more or less optional”) and morbid introspection (“I need works but I don’t think mine are good enough!”).
The Bible and Alistair Begg (and other pastors) have helped me a lot. Christ’s work is the grounds of my justification, but justification will always result in some measure of fruit. AND a healthy way to live in light of this is not to constantly evaluate how much/how good my fruit is, but to be more and more enthralled with Christ, the vine.
I’m not sure which Reformer said it, but I think whoever said “we’re justified by faith alone, but not by faith that is alone” said it best.
Thanks for the article, I really like your blog and the podcast!
It seems like the system of justification by faith that you describe above, with reference to G.K. Beale, is pretty similar to N.T. Wright’s view. Would you agree?
The good works of the righteous will be rewarded and the deeds of the wicked will likewise be punished. The context of Romans 2 has nothing to do with providing evidence of one’s justification by works or a two-stage system of justification. Interesting that in support of your doctrine, you appeal to Richard Gaffin a guy who spent years defending neolegalist Norm Shepherd. Besides, in the very next chapter, Paul says “Therefore no one will be declared righteous in God’s sight by the works of the law.” In fact, Jesus tells us in Matthew 25 that the righteous will be completely oblivious of doing any good works at all(!), let alone present their works as their heavenly Costco card. Romans 2 doesn’t support the cosmic Costco card either. R. Scott Clark has written quite a bit dispelling the idea of a two-stage scheme of justification. I suggest you look him up.
I’ll save you some time. Start here https://rscottclark.org/tag/two-stages/